by VigilantEditor
24. October 2011 13:01
It
was a roll of the dice that paid off for one employer, who investigated an
employee’s FMLA absences and caught him on a gambling binge. The employee was
taking intermittent leave for depression, migraines and stress. For several
days in a row, the employee called in and said that he was too depressed to
work. His supervisor visited the employee’s home to assess the situation and
found him absent. Suspecting that he might be indulging his gambling addiction,
the supervisor made some calls to various Atlantic City casinos and eventually
located the employee. The employee was terminated for abusing the company’s
sick leave policy and lying about his reason for leave, but he creatively
argued that the company interfered with his FMLA rights because gambling was
helping to treat his depression. Not surprisingly, the court didn’t
buy it. The employee had called into work only one hour before each shift
to ask for time off, claiming that it wasn’t until that very moment that he
knew he was too depressed to work. But the court found it significant that the
drive from Atlantic City was over four hours long, showing that the employee
had no intention of trying to work well before he called in. Additionally, the
court didn’t believe gambling was helping the employee to treat his depression
and, in fact, found evidence to show that it was actually making his condition
worse. Notably, the court concluded that gambling is not a proper use of FMLA
leave (Campbell
v. Verizon, ED Virginia, Sept. 2011).
Tips: Terminating an employee for activities
that are seemingly inconsistent with FMLA leave requires close scrutiny on a
case-by-case basis. Don’t assume that an employee is lying about their FMLA
leave or underlying condition if they are taking vacations or enjoying
themselves during leave. While this employee crossed a line with excessive
gambling, it may be difficult to tell where proper FMLA leave ends and abuse of
the system begins. Contact your Vigilant staff representative to discuss any
specific situations before taking disciplinary action.